NVIDIACORP.et al. v.E.OHMANJ:ORFONDERAB et al.

certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit No.23–970.ArguedNovember13,2024—DecidedDecember11,2024 Certioraridismissed.Reportedbelow:81F.4th918.

Thewritofcertiorariisdismissedasimprovidently granted.

It is so ordered.

Neal Kumar Katyal arguedthecauseforpetitioners.

WithhimonthebriefswereKatherine B. Wellington, Wil liam E. Havemann, Reedy C. Swanson, Sarah M. Lightdale, Patrick J. Hayden, John C. Dwyer, Patrick E. Gibbs, Sa mantha A. Kirby, andKathleen R. Hartnett.

Deepak Gupta arguedthecauseforrespondents.With himonthebriefwereJonathan E. Taylor, Gregory A. Beck, Eric F. Citron, Jennifer D. Bennett, Salvatore J. Graziano, andAndrew L. Zivitz.

Colleen E. Roh Sinzdak arguedthecausefortheUnited Statesasamicus curiae urgingaffirmance.Withheron thebriefwereSolicitor General Prelogar, Deputy Solic itor General Stewart, Michael A. Conley, andDaniel Staroselsky.* *Briefsofamici curiae urgingreversalwerefiledfortheAtlanticLegal FoundationbyLawrence S. Ebner;fortheDigitalChamberbyFrank Scaduto, Kevin B. Muhlendorf, andKrystal B. Swendsboe;fortheWashingtonLegalFoundationetal.byJames N. Kramer andDaniel A. Ru bens;andforJosephA.GrundfestbyChristopher G. Michel. Briefsofamici curiae urgingaffirmancewerefiledfortheAmerican AssociationforJusticebyRobert S. Peck andJeffrey R. White;forthe Anti-FraudCoalitionbyTejinder Singh;forCertainInstitutionalInvestorsbyPaul Bland;forQuantitativeExpertsbyJohn Paul Schnapper Page Proof Pending Publication Citeas:604U.S.20(2024) Counsel Casteras, Mark C. Rifkin, Benjamin Y. Kaufman, Matthew M. Guiney, Laura H. Posner, Carol V. Gilden, andNicholas I. Porritt;andforScholarsofCivilProcedurebyJ. Carl Cecere, Jeremy A. Lieberman, and Emma Gilmore.

Briefsofamici curiae werefiledforFormerSECOfficialsbySamuel H. Rudman, Daniel P. Chiplock, andMichael J. Miarmi;forBrianT. FitzpatrickbyJavier Bleichmar andJoseph A. Fonti;andforThomas FullerOgden, pro se.

Page Proof Pending Publication Page Proof Pending Publication Reporter’s Note Theattachedopinionhasbeenrevisedtoreflecttheusualpublication andcitationstyleoftheUnitedStatesReports.Therevisedpagination makesavailabletheofficialUnitedStatesReportscitationinadvanceof publication.ThesyllabushasbeenpreparedbytheReporterofDecisions fortheconvenienceofthereaderandconstitutesnopartoftheopinionof theCourt.Alistofcounselwhoarguedorfiledbriefsinthiscase,and whoweremembersofthebarofthisCourtatthetimethiscasewas argued,hasbeeninsertedfollowingthesyllabus.Otherrevisionsmay includeadjustmentstoformatting,captions,citationform,andanyerrant punctuation.Thefollowingadditionaleditsweremade: None